Rankine Cycle Efficiency Calculator
Estimates the thermal efficiency of a Rankine steam power cycle given boiler and condenser pressures, superheat temperature, and component efficiencies. Use it to benchmark steam power plant performance and compare design configurations.
Last updated: September 2026
Formula below · 2 sources (NIST, Wikipedia) · Updated Sep 2026
Compare with similar
About this calculator
The Rankine cycle is the thermodynamic backbone of steam power plants: pump compression, boiler heat addition, turbine expansion and condenser heat rejection. Thermal efficiency is η = (w_t − w_p) / q_in × 100%. Values come from the IAPWS-IF97 industrial formulation (region 1 for liquid water, region 2 for steam, region 4 for the saturation line), the same equations used in published steam tables. The turbine inlet state is set by the boiler pressure and steam temperature; the ideal turbine exhaust is found at the condenser pressure with the same entropy (a wet mixture of quality x₂s = (s₁ − s_f)/(s_g − s_f) in most cases). Turbine work is w_t = η_t × (h₁ − h₂s). The pump raises saturated liquid from condenser to boiler pressure: w_p = v_f × (P_boiler − P_condenser) / η_p. Heat added in the boiler is q_in = h₁ − (h_f + w_p). Higher superheat temperature and boiler pressure increase efficiency, and so does a lower condenser pressure.
How to use
Set boiler pressure = 50 bar, superheated steam temperature = 500 °C, condenser pressure = 0.1 bar, turbine isentropic efficiency = 85%, pump efficiency = 80%. Step 1 — turbine inlet from IAPWS-IF97: h₁ = 3434.5 kJ/kg, s₁ = 6.978 kJ/(kg·K). Step 2 — ideal exhaust at 0.1 bar: x₂s = 0.844, h₂s = 2210.4 kJ/kg. Step 3 — w_t = 0.85 × (3434.5 − 2210.4) = 1040.5 kJ/kg. Step 4 — w_p = 0.00101 × (5000 − 10) / 0.80 = 6.3 kJ/kg. Step 5 — q_in = 3434.5 − 191.8 − 6.3 = 3236.4 kJ/kg. Efficiency η = (1040.5 − 6.3) / 3236.4 = 32.0%. At 400 °C instead of 500 °C the efficiency falls to 30.7%.
Frequently asked questions
How does superheated steam temperature affect Rankine cycle efficiency?
Increasing the turbine inlet temperature raises the average temperature at which heat is added to the cycle, directly increasing thermal efficiency in line with the Carnot principle. Superheating also ensures the steam remains dry (high quality) throughout turbine expansion, reducing blade erosion and mechanical losses. Modern supercritical plants operate above 600 °C and achieve efficiencies exceeding 45%, compared to around 33–38% for subcritical plants at 400 °C. However, higher temperatures require expensive alloy steels and introduce materials engineering challenges.
Why does lower condenser pressure improve Rankine cycle efficiency?
The condenser operates below atmospheric pressure (typically 0.03–0.1 bar), and lowering this pressure reduces the enthalpy of the steam leaving the turbine, increasing the enthalpy drop and thus the turbine work output. It also lowers the temperature of heat rejection, widening the temperature difference between heat source and sink — the fundamental driver of thermodynamic efficiency. In practice, the condenser pressure is limited by the temperature of the available cooling water; a 10 °C river or seawater intake sets a practical floor. Vacuum systems require leak-tight condenser designs that add cost and maintenance.
What is the difference between ideal and actual Rankine cycle efficiency?
The ideal Rankine cycle assumes perfectly isentropic (lossless) turbine and pump operation, resulting in the maximum theoretical efficiency for the given pressure and temperature conditions. Actual efficiency is lower because turbines have isentropic efficiencies of 80–90% (due to blade friction, leakage, and flow irreversibilities) and pumps lose energy to hydraulic friction. Additional real-world losses include boiler heat losses, pipe friction pressure drops, and mechanical bearing friction. A cycle that looks 40% efficient in theory might achieve only 32–36% in an actual plant, making component efficiency the primary engineering lever for improvement.